Blockchain
Top Non EVM Blockchain Plateforms
In a rapidly evolving blockchain ecosystem dominated by EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine) mechanisms, a diverse array of NON-EVM cha…
Read articleSmart contracts, decentralised applications, and sovereign layer 1 networks, built on Ethereum and the EVM chains, Solana, Stellar, MultiversX, Substrate, and Cosmos, then audited before they ever hold value.
Micro IT Industry builds smart contracts, dApps, tokens, and enterprise blockchain systems across both EVM and non-EVM networks, with dedicated practices for Ethereum and EVM layer 2s, Solana, Stellar, Cosmos, Substrate and Polkadot, MultiversX, and purpose-built layer 1 chains. Work covers protocol design through security review and node infrastructure.
“If you are looking to work with an entity that can help you realize your full potential, this is the place. They played a major role in helping me to develop the blockchain platform in a short period of time and with great quality. I look forward to working with them on my other projects.”
Blockchain is worth using when several parties need to agree on a record that none of them controls, settling payments, issuing assets, tracking provenance, or coordinating between organisations that will not hand each other a database. Where that is genuinely the problem, the technology is transformative. Where it is not, we will say so.
We work across the whole stack: smart contracts and on-chain programs, the runtimes and consensus of sovereign layer 1 networks, the wallets and interfaces users touch, and the integrations that connect all of it to the systems your business already runs on.
Consensus Layer
Validated · replicated · immutable
0x8f2a…c41d
Transfer · 240 operations
0x71bc…9e07
Contract deploy · verified
0x3d09…a55f
Cross-chain message · relayed
0x0a47…12b8
Staking rewards · distributed
Each ecosystem has its own execution model, tooling, and economics. Pick a network to see how we build for it.
Comprehensive blockchain solutions tailored to your specific business needs.
Secure, gas-efficient contracts in the language each network actually uses Solidity, Rust, CosmWasm, or ink!.
The chain itself: consensus, custom runtime modules, token economics, validator infrastructure, and mainnet launch.
The application layer users actually touch, wallet connection, transaction UX, and interfaces that survive congestion.
Token design and issuance across standards, from fungible tokens and stablecoins to NFTs and tokenised real-world assets.
Independent review of contracts and protocol code, focused on the vulnerability classes each ecosystem actually suffers from.
Connecting chains to the systems around them, and helping you decide whether blockchain is the right answer at all.
Networks, contract languages, and audit tooling for secure, gas-efficient decentralised applications.
Base-layer chains we build protocols, contracts, and applications on.
Layer 2 rollups, sidechains, and permissioned ledgers for enterprise workloads.
The languages and VMs behind EVM, Wasm, and Solana Sealevel contracts.
The development, indexing, and front-end stack around the chain.
Static analysis, fuzzing, price feeds, and the infrastructure that keeps nodes healthy.
Working with something else? Our teams pick up new tools quickly. Tell us about your stack.
The problems our clients bring us most often, and where distributed ledgers genuinely earn their place.
Cross-border transfers, stablecoin rails, and micropayments that settle in seconds.
Exchanges, lending markets, staking, and vaults with the arithmetic reviewed properly.
Traceability systems where multiple organisations need one record none of them controls.
Securities, funds, and commodities issued on chain with compliance rules attached.
Collections, marketplaces, ticketing, and certification backed by verifiable ownership.
In-game economies and loyalty products at transaction costs that make them viable.
Permissioned networks shared between organisations that do not fully trust each other.
Bridges, relayers, and messaging that let assets and data move between ecosystems.
A structured approach to ensure the successful delivery of your blockchain project.
We start by testing whether blockchain is the right tool at all, and if it is, which network fits. Fees, finality, ecosystem liquidity, compliance, and where your users already are all feed into a written recommendation.
What lives on chain versus off it, the contract or module structure, the token model, key management, and the upgrade strategy, all specified before implementation so the expensive decisions are made deliberately.
Contracts and chain logic written in sprints with tests from the first commit, deployed to a devnet or testnet your team can use throughout rather than at the end.
Front ends, wallet integration, indexers, and backend services: the parts that decide whether people can actually use what has been deployed.
Internal review, static analysis, and fuzzing, then an external audit where value at risk warrants it, followed by remediation and re-testing before anything touches mainnet.
Staged mainnet deployment with monitoring, alerting, and incident procedures, then upgrades, parameter tuning, and support as usage grows.
Writing from the team that builds these systems.
In a rapidly evolving blockchain ecosystem dominated by EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine) mechanisms, a diverse array of NON-EVM cha…
Read articleFind answers to common questions about our blockchain development services.
It depends on what your product does. Ethereum and the EVM chains (BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base) are the default when you need deep liquidity, mature tooling, and the largest developer ecosystem. Payments and asset issuance suit Stellar; high-throughput consumer applications suit Solana; and products that need their own block space, governance, or compliance rules are better served by an appchain on the Cosmos SDK or a Substrate parachain. MultiversX is a strong fit where sharded throughput and native token primitives matter. We assess fees, finality, ecosystem maturity, and regulatory position, then give you a recommendation in writing with the trade-offs stated.
Most products should start with contracts on an existing network, because it is faster, cheaper, and inherits security and liquidity you would otherwise have to build. Your own layer 1 becomes worth it when fee volatility breaks your unit economics, when you need protocol-level rules or permissioned validators, or when your throughput would be uneconomic on shared block space. We are happy to tell you when a chain is not warranted.
Security is part of the build rather than a phase at the end. That means threat modelling during architecture, test coverage including adversarial cases, static analysis and fuzzing in CI, internal review against each ecosystem’s known vulnerability classes, and an external audit before significant value is at stake. We also design the operational side, including upgrade authority, multisig thresholds, and incident procedures, because a large share of losses come from key management rather than code.
A focused contract with a front end is typically 8 to 14 weeks. A full dApp with multiple contracts, indexing, wallet integration, and an audit usually runs 4 to 8 months. A sovereign layer 1 or parachain, including testnet and launch, runs 7 to 18 months. We stage delivery so something is running on a testnet within the first weeks in every case.
Yes. We take on contract audits, protocol reviews, and inherited codebases regularly. We start with an assessment of the code, the deployment setup, and the operational controls, then give you a written picture of its condition and a prioritised plan before making changes. Common engagements are deferred SDK upgrades, contract refactors, infrastructure hardening, and taking over operations from a team that has moved on.
First by choosing the right network, which has more impact than any optimisation afterwards. Then by keeping only what needs consensus on chain, batching where possible, optimising contract execution and storage, and using layer 2s, appchains, or state compression where the workload justifies them. We model expected transaction volume and cost during architecture so the economics are understood before you commit to a design.
Tell us what you are trying to build and which constraints you are working under. We will come back with a network recommendation, an architecture, and a delivery plan, including when the answer is that you do not need a blockchain at all.